SNMPV2-TC :: RowStatus
NameRowStatus
Base-Typeinteger
Known-Values
Statuscurrent
Description

The RowStatus textual convention is used to manage the creation and deletion of conceptual rows, and is used as the value of the SYNTAX clause for the status column of a conceptual row (as described in Section 7.7.1 of [2].)

The status column has six defined values:

    - `active', which indicates that the conceptual row is
    available for use by the managed device;

    - `notInService', which indicates that the conceptual
    row exists in the agent, but is unavailable for use by
    the managed device (see NOTE below);

    - `notReady', which indicates that the conceptual row
    exists in the agent, but is missing information
    necessary in order to be available for use by the
    managed device;

    - `createAndGo', which is supplied by a management
    station wishing to create a new instance of a
    conceptual row and to have its status automatically set
    to active, making it available for use by the managed
    device;

    - `createAndWait', which is supplied by a management
    station wishing to create a new instance of a
    conceptual row (but not make it available for use by
    the managed device); and,

    - `destroy', which is supplied by a management station
    wishing to delete all of the instances associated with
    an existing conceptual row.

Whereas five of the six values (all except `notReady') may be specified in a management protocol set operation, only three values will be returned in response to a management protocol retrieval operation:  `notReady', `notInService' or `active'.  That is, when queried, an existing conceptual row has only three states:  it is either available for use by the managed device (the status column has value `active'); it is not available for use by the managed device, though the agent has sufficient information to make it so (the status column has value `notInService'); or, it is not available for use by the managed device, and an attempt to make it so would fail because the agent has insufficient information (the state column has value `notReady').

                        NOTE WELL

    This textual convention may be used for a MIB table,
    irrespective of whether the values of that table's
    conceptual rows are able to be modified while it is
    active, or whether its conceptual rows must be taken
    out of service in order to be modified.  That is, it is
    the responsibility of the DESCRIPTION clause of the
    status column to specify whether the status column must
    not be `active' in order for the value of some other
    column of the same conceptual row to be modified.  If
    such a specification is made, affected columns may be
    changed by an SNMP set PDU if the RowStatus would not
    be equal to `active' either immediately before or after
    processing the PDU.  In other words, if the PDU also
    contained a varbind that would change the RowStatus
    value, the column in question may be changed if the
    RowStatus was not equal to `active' as the PDU was
    received, or if the varbind sets the status to a value
    other than 'active'.

Also note that whenever any elements of a row exist, the RowStatus column must also exist.

To summarize the effect of having a conceptual row with a status column having a SYNTAX clause value of RowStatus, consider the following state diagram:

                            STATE
 +--------------+-----------+-------------+-------------
 |      A       |     B     |      C      |      D
 |              |status col.|status column|
 |status column |    is     |      is     |status column
ACTION    |does not exist|  notReady | notInService|  is active --------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- set status    |noError    ->D|inconsist- |inconsistent-|inconsistent- column to     |       or     |   entValue|        Value|        Value createAndGo   |inconsistent- |           |             |
 |         Value|           |             |
--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- set status    |noError  see 1|inconsist- |inconsistent-|inconsistent- column to     |       or     |   entValue|        Value|        Value createAndWait |wrongValue    |           |             | --------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- set status    |inconsistent- |inconsist- |noError      |noError column to     |         Value|   entValue|             | active        |              |           |             |
 |              |     or    |             |
 |              |           |             |
 |              |see 2   ->D|          ->D|          ->D
--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- set status    |inconsistent- |inconsist- |noError      |noError   ->C column to     |         Value|   entValue|             | notInService  |              |           |             |
 |              |     or    |             |      or
 |              |           |             |
 |              |see 3   ->C|          ->C|wrongValue
--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- set status    |noError       |noError    |noError      |noError column to     |              |           |             | destroy       |           ->A|        ->A|          ->A|          ->A --------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+------------- set any other |see 4         |noError    |noError      |see 5 column to some|              |           |             | value         |              |      see 1|          ->C|          ->D --------------+--------------+-----------+-------------+-------------

(1) goto B or C, depending on information available to the agent.

(2) if other variable bindings included in the same PDU, provide values for all columns which are missing but required, then return noError and goto D.

(3) if other variable bindings included in the same PDU, provide values for all columns which are missing but required, then return noError and goto C.

(4) at the discretion of the agent, the return value may be either:

    inconsistentName:  because the agent does not choose to
    create such an instance when the corresponding
    RowStatus instance does not exist, or

    inconsistentValue:  if the supplied value is
    inconsistent with the state of some other MIB object's
    value, or

    noError: because the agent chooses to create the
    instance.

If noError is returned, then the instance of the status column must also be created, and the new state is B or C, depending on the information available to the agent.  If inconsistentName or inconsistentValue is returned, the row remains in state A.

(5) depending on the MIB definition for the column/table, either noError or inconsistentValue may be returned.

NOTE: Other processing of the set request may result in a response other than noError being returned, e.g., wrongValue, noCreation, etc.

                 Conceptual Row Creation

There are four potential interactions when creating a conceptual row:  selecting an instance-identifier which is not in use; creating the conceptual row; initializing any objects for which the agent does not supply a default; and, making the conceptual row available for use by the managed device.

Interaction 1: Selecting an Instance-Identifier

The algorithm used to select an instance-identifier varies for each conceptual row.  In some cases, the instance- identifier is semantically significant, e.g., the destination address of a route, and a management station selects the instance-identifier according to the semantics.

In other cases, the instance-identifier is used solely to distinguish conceptual rows, and a management station without specific knowledge of the conceptual row might examine the instances present in order to determine an unused instance-identifier.  (This approach may be used, but it is often highly sub-optimal; however, it is also a questionable practice for a naive management station to attempt conceptual row creation.)

Alternately, the MIB module which defines the conceptual row might provide one or more objects which provide assistance in determining an unused instance-identifier.  For example, if the conceptual row is indexed by an integer-value, then an object having an integer-valued SYNTAX clause might be defined for such a purpose, allowing a management station to issue a management protocol retrieval operation.  In order to avoid unnecessary collisions between competing management stations, `adjacent' retrievals of this object should be different.

Finally, the management station could select a pseudo-random number to use as the index.  In the event that this index was already in use and an inconsistentValue was returned in response to the management protocol set operation, the management station should simply select a new pseudo-random number and retry the operation.

A MIB designer should choose between the two latter algorithms based on the size of the table (and therefore the efficiency of each algorithm).  For tables in which a large number of entries are expected, it is recommended that a MIB object be defined that returns an acceptable index for creation.  For tables with small numbers of entries, it is recommended that the latter pseudo-random index mechanism be used.

Interaction 2: Creating the Conceptual Row

Once an unused instance-identifier has been selected, the management station determines if it wishes to create and activate the conceptual row in one transaction or in a negotiated set of interactions.

Interaction 2a: Creating and Activating the Conceptual Row

The management station must first determine the column requirements, i.e., it must determine those columns for which it must or must not provide values.  Depending on the complexity of the table and the management station's knowledge of the agent's capabilities, this determination can be made locally by the management station.  Alternately, the management station issues a management protocol get operation to examine all columns in the conceptual row that it wishes to create.  In response, for each column, there are three possible outcomes:

    - a value is returned, indicating that some other
    management station has already created this conceptual
    row.  We return to interaction 1.

    - the exception `noSuchInstance' is returned,
    indicating that the agent implements the object-type
    associated with this column, and that this column in at
    least one conceptual row would be accessible in the MIB
    view used by the retrieval were it to exist. For those
    columns to which the agent provides read-create access,
    the `noSuchInstance' exception tells the management
    station that it should supply a value for this column
    when the conceptual row is to be created.

    - the exception `noSuchObject' is returned, indicating
    that the agent does not implement the object-type
    associated with this column or that there is no
    conceptual row for which this column would be
    accessible in the MIB view used by the retrieval.  As
    such, the management station can not issue any
    management protocol set operations to create an
    instance of this column.

Once the column requirements have been determined, a management protocol set operation is accordingly issued. This operation also sets the new instance of the status column to `createAndGo'.

When the agent processes the set operation, it verifies that it has sufficient information to make the conceptual row available for use by the managed device.  The information available to the agent is provided by two sources:  the management protocol set operation which creates the conceptual row, and, implementation-specific defaults supplied by the agent (note that an agent must provide implementation-specific defaults for at least those objects which it implements as read-only).  If there is sufficient information available, then the conceptual row is created, a `noError' response is returned, the status column is set to `active', and no further interactions are necessary (i.e., interactions 3 and 4 are skipped).  If there is insufficient information, then the conceptual row is not created, and the set operation fails with an error of `inconsistentValue'. On this error, the management station can issue a management protocol retrieval operation to determine if this was because it failed to specify a value for a required column, or, because the selected instance of the status column already existed.  In the latter case, we return to interaction 1.  In the former case, the management station can re-issue the set operation with the additional information, or begin interaction 2 again using `createAndWait' in order to negotiate creation of the conceptual row.

                        NOTE WELL

    Regardless of the method used to determine the column
    requirements, it is possible that the management
    station might deem a column necessary when, in fact,
    the agent will not allow that particular columnar
    instance to be created or written.  In this case, the
    management protocol set operation will fail with an
    error such as `noCreation' or `notWritable'.  In this
    case, the management station decides whether it needs
    to be able to set a value for that particular columnar
    instance.  If not, the management station re-issues the
    management protocol set operation, but without setting
    a value for that particular columnar instance;
    otherwise, the management station aborts the row
    creation algorithm.

Interaction 2b: Negotiating the Creation of the Conceptual Row

The management station issues a management protocol set operation which sets the desired instance of the status

column to `createAndWait'.  If the agent is unwilling to process a request of this sort, the set operation fails with an error of `wrongValue'.  (As a consequence, such an agent must be prepared to accept a single management protocol set operation, i.e., interaction 2a above, containing all of the columns indicated by its column requirements.)  Otherwise, the conceptual row is created, a `noError' response is returned, and the status column is immediately set to either `notInService' or `notReady', depending on whether it has sufficient information to make the conceptual row available for use by the managed device.  If there is sufficient information available, then the status column is set to `notInService'; otherwise, if there is insufficient information, then the status column is set to `notReady'. Regardless, we proceed to interaction 3.

Interaction 3: Initializing non-defaulted Objects

The management station must now determine the column requirements.  It issues a management protocol get operation to examine all columns in the created conceptual row.  In the response, for each column, there are three possible outcomes:

    - a value is returned, indicating that the agent
    implements the object-type associated with this column
    and had sufficient information to provide a value.  For
    those columns to which the agent provides read-create
    access (and for which the agent allows their values to
    be changed after their creation), a value return tells
    the management station that it may issue additional
    management protocol set operations, if it desires, in
    order to change the value associated with this column.

    - the exception `noSuchInstance' is returned,
    indicating that the agent implements the object-type
    associated with this column, and that this column in at
    least one conceptual row would be accessible in the MIB
    view used by the retrieval were it to exist. However,
    the agent does not have sufficient information to
    provide a value, and until a value is provided, the
    conceptual row may not be made available for use by the
    managed device.  For those columns to which the agent
    provides read-create access, the `noSuchInstance'
    exception tells the management station that it must
    issue additional management protocol set operations, in
    order to provide a value associated with this column.

    - the exception `noSuchObject' is returned, indicating
    that the agent does not implement the object-type
    associated with this column or that there is no
    conceptual row for which this column would be
    accessible in the MIB view used by the retrieval.  As
    such, the management station can not issue any
    management protocol set operations to create an
    instance of this column.

If the value associated with the status column is `notReady', then the management station must first deal with all `noSuchInstance' columns, if any.  Having done so, the value of the status column becomes `notInService', and we proceed to interaction 4.

Interaction 4: Making the Conceptual Row Available

Once the management station is satisfied with the values associated with the columns of the conceptual row, it issues a management protocol set operation to set the status column to `active'.  If the agent has sufficient information to make the conceptual row available for use by the managed device, the management protocol set operation succeeds (a `noError' response is returned).  Otherwise, the management protocol set operation fails with an error of `inconsistentValue'.

                        NOTE WELL

    A conceptual row having a status column with value
    `notInService' or `notReady' is unavailable to the
    managed device.  As such, it is possible for the
    managed device to create its own instances during the
    time between the management protocol set operation
    which sets the status column to `createAndWait' and the
    management protocol set operation which sets the status
    column to `active'.  In this case, when the management
    protocol set operation is issued to set the status
    column to `active', the values held in the agent
    supersede those used by the managed device.

If the management station is prevented from setting the status column to `active' (e.g., due to management station or network failure) the conceptual row will be left in the `notInService' or `notReady' state, consuming resources indefinitely.  The agent must detect conceptual rows that have been in either state for an abnormally long period of

time and remove them.  It is the responsibility of the DESCRIPTION clause of the status column to indicate what an abnormally long period of time would be.  This period of time should be long enough to allow for human response time (including `think time') between the creation of the conceptual row and the setting of the status to `active'. In the absense of such information in the DESCRIPTION clause, it is suggested that this period be approximately 5 minutes in length.  This removal action applies not only to newly-created rows, but also to previously active rows which are set to, and left in, the notInService state for a prolonged period exceeding that which is considered normal for such a conceptual row.

                Conceptual Row Suspension

When a conceptual row is `active', the management station may issue a management protocol set operation which sets the instance of the status column to `notInService'.  If the agent is unwilling to do so, the set operation fails with an error of `wrongValue'.  Otherwise, the conceptual row is taken out of service, and a `noError' response is returned. It is the responsibility of the DESCRIPTION clause of the status column to indicate under what circumstances the status column should be taken out of service (e.g., in order for the value of some other column of the same conceptual row to be modified).

                 Conceptual Row Deletion

For deletion of conceptual rows, a management protocol set operation is issued which sets the instance of the status column to `destroy'.  This request may be made regardless of the current value of the status column (e.g., it is possible to delete conceptual rows which are either `notReady', `notInService' or `active'.)  If the operation succeeds, then all instances associated with the conceptual row are immediately removed.

< Back (SNMPV2-TC)

What did you think of this topic?